But at the cost of giving up Wilson, those players wouldn't be worth it. There's no doubt that Mack and Hicks would help to upgrade Seattle's defensive line and reinvigorate a pass rush that could use some help. As good of a player as he is, taking him on at this age would be a risk. Meanwhile, Hicks turned 31 this year and has played just 20 of the last 36 games for the Bears. Mack turned 30 this offseason, and while the perennial Pro Bowl may still have many good seasons left in the tank, the chances of a decline increase once players pass that point. The other problem with Mack and Hicks being potential headliners is that they're getting older. 20 pick wouldn't put them in position to land one. Why? Well, first of all, they'd still need a quarterback to lead the team, and the Bears' No. Update your settings here to see it.Īs appealing as those names may be on the surface, they probably wouldn't move the needle much for the Seahawks.
This content is not available due to your privacy preferences.
0 kommentar(er)
